Come and ask, answer or inform.
Great Britain | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| British Squadron, Richard EdwardsBritish Naval Sailor Service 1688-1708 | |||
| Ship Name | Commander | Notes | |
| Name : Cumberland (80)
1695-1707 British 80 Gun 3rd Rate Ship of the Line | Richard EdwardsBritish Naval Sailor Service 1688-1708 | Fleet Flagship Captured | |
| Name : Devonshire (80)
1704-1707 British 80 Gun 3rd Rate Ship of the Line | John WatkinsBritish †Naval Sailor Service 1694-1707 | Exploded | |
| Name : Royal Oak (70)
1690-1710 British 70 Gun 3rd Rate Ship of the Line | Baron WyldeBritish Naval Sailor Service 1683-1707 | ||
| Name : Ruby (50)
1706-1707 British 50 Gun 4th Rate Ship of the Line | The Hon. Peregrine BertieBritish Naval Sailor Service 1697-1707 | Captured | |
| Name : Chester (54)
1691-1707 British 54 Gun 4th Rate Ship of the Line | John BalchenBritish Naval Sailor Service 1685-1736 | Captured | |
Royaume de France | |||
| French First Squadron, René Trouin (Sieur du Gué)French Naval Sailor Ship Owner Privateer Service 1689-1734 | |||
| Ship Name | Commander | Notes | |
| Name : Le Lys (72)
1706-1747 French 72 Gun 3rd Rate Ship of the Line | René Trouin (Sieur du Gué)French Naval Sailor Ship Owner Privateer Service 1689-1734 | Squadron Flagship | |
| Name : L'Achille (64/54)
1705-1744 French 64/54 Gun 3rd Rate Ship of the Line | Charles de Beauharnais de la BoischeFrench Naval Sailor Administrator Marine Service 1691-1748 | ||
| Name : Le Jason (58)
1704-1720 French 58 Gun 3rd Rate Ship of the Line | de Coursérac (Chevalier de Coursérac)French Naval Sailor Ship Owner Service 1703-1709 | ||
| Name : Le Maure (50)
1688-1710 French 50 Gun 3rd Rate Ship of the Line | |||
| Name : L'Amazone (42)
1707-1748 French 42 Gun 4th Rate Frigate | Joseph de Nesmond de BrieFrench Naval Sailor Service 1690-1714 | ||
| Name : La Gloire (38)
1707-1709 French 38 Gun 5th Rate Frigate | de la Jaille (Sieur de la Jaille)French Naval Sailor Service 1707-1710 | ||
| French Second Squadron, Claude de Forbin (Comte de Forbin-Gardanne)French Naval Sailor Service 1675-1715 | |||
| Ship Name | Commander | Notes | |
| Name : Le Mars (54)
1705-1721 French 54 Gun 4th Rate Ship of the Line | Squadron Flagship | ||
| Name : Le Blakoual (52)
1705-1708 French 52 Gun 4th Rate Ship of the Line | Jean Alexandre de TourouvreFrench Naval Sailor Service 1657-1745 | ||
| Name : Le Salisbury (50)
1703-1708 French 50 Gun 4th Rate Ship of the Line | Kerlo de l' IsleFrench , Naval Sailor Service 1706-1707 Louis-Isidore Andigné (Chevalier de Vezins)French Naval Sailor Service 1657-1707 | ||
| Name : Protée (48)
1700-1725 French 48 Gun 4th Rate Frigate (Frégate-Vaisseau de 1er Ordre) 1705 Renamed "Protée" | Henri Illiers (Comte d'Illiers)French Naval Sailor Service 1677-1707 | ||
| Name : Le Gerze (42)
1691-1717 French 42 Gun 4th Rate Ship of the Line | François Cornil BartFrench Naval Sailor Service 1688-1750 | ||
| Name : Le Griffon (48)
1705-1748 French 48 Gun 4th Rate Ship of the Line | Pierre-Cesar de Brichanteau (Comte de Nangis)French Naval Sailor Service 1683-1728 | ||
| Name : La Dauphine (60)
1706-1719 French 60 Gun 4th Rate Ship of the Line | Jacques Aymar de Roquefeuil et du Bousquet (Comte de Roquefeuil)French , Naval Sailor Administrator Service 1681-1722 Jean de Gouyon-Beaufort (Chevalier de Gouyon)French Naval Sailor Privateer Service 1690-1733 | ||
| Name : Le Fidèle (58)
1704-1712 French 58 Gun 3rd Rate Ship of the Line | Nicolas François d'Hennequin (Comte d'Hennequin)French Naval Sailor Privateer Service 1705-1707 | ||
On October 9th, 1707, a fleet of about one hundred and thirty sail, bound for Lisbon with merchandise, warlike stores, and horses, sailed from Plymouth under convoy of the Cumberland, 80, Commodore Richard Edwards, Devonshire, 80, Captain John Watkins, Royal Oak, 76, Captain Baron Wyld, Chester, 50, Captain John Balchen, and Ruby, 50, Captain the Hon. Peregrine Bertie. By that time Du Guay Trouin, who had been cruising against the Portuguese in the Atlantic, and had also captured several British vessels, had returned to Brest with his six ships. There Forbin, returning from his northern expedition, had joined him; and the two commanders had received orders to put to sea together against the Portugal convoy. Forbin's division still consisted of eight of the nine men-of-war which had been engaged in the affair of May 1st; Du Guay Trouin's was made up of the Lys, 72, his own ship, Achille, 64, Jason, 54, Maure, 50, Amazone, 40, and Gloire, 38. The French had thus fourteen men-of-war to pit against the British five; and about six hundred guns to pit against the British three hundred and thirty-six.
The French fell in with the convoy off the Lizard on October 10th; and the British captains, in order to give time for the merchantmen to save themselves, engaged the enemy with great stubbornness, and studiously intercepted him. In point of fact very few of the merchantmen were taken; but in other respects the result of the action was most serious. The Cumberland struck to the Lys, the Chester to the Jason, and the Ruby to the Amazone. The Devonshire, after making a running fight with five vessels until the evening, blew up; and, of all on board, only two men were saved. As for the Royal Oak, she was run foul of by the Achille, each ship losing her bowsprit by the shock; and, having repulsed an attempt to board, she got away with a loss of but twelve men killed and twenty-seven wounded. Picking up a few straggling merchantmen, she reached Kingsale in safety with them.
Captain Edwards, after his release from captivity, was brought before a court-martial, which honourably acquitted him Captain Watkins perished with nearly nine hundred of his men; Captain Wyld, who was deemed to have misbehaved himself, especially in breaking the line, was sentenced to dismissal from the service; but was subsequently, and perhaps deservedly, restored to it. Captain Balchen returned to England, and was absolved by a court-martial from all blame for the loss of his ship. Captain Bertie did not live to return, but died while still a prisoner in France.
There seems to have been lack of good feeling and loyal cooperation between Du Guay Trouin and Forbin; and there is much reason to believe that, had they worked together better than they did, not a single ship, either of the escort or of the convoy would have escaped them.